Pros and Cons of Autocratic Leadership

Autocratic Leadership

Authoritarian leadership is a management style someone has decision. A leader makes decisions on group goals and policies, processes with little if any input from followers or his or her team members. Listed below are the chief features of nonverbal leadership:

Leaders make decisions with little if any involvement or imaginative input from their associates or group members - Leaders independently preside over policies and procedures - Group members are constantly completely supervised by the chief - Authoritarian leadership is beneficial in businesses and organizations where decisions they must be made urgently and economically, and where it's essential that certain jobs are performed in a particular manner and there is little room for errors, like in construction, production and the military.

Using this kind of leadership prevents the likelihood of jobs getting blindsided by a lack of business or strong deadlines and allows team members to focus on particular tasks without having to take part in the complex decision making process. Authoritarian leadership may also be advantageous in cases where the chief is the most experienced person in an organization. There are various openings to authoritarian direction, however. Excessive use of the leadership style can cause the leader to be seen as domineering and iron fisted, which may breed resentment or aggression among group members.

In addition, followers might grow to resent that they aren't able to contribute their skills or opinions to decision making. These elements might lead to a higher churn rate. In addition, authoritarian leaders are usually lacking in creative problem-solving abilities, which may hurt a group's operations. Authoritarian leadership is the most valuable in situations where supervisors are training or regulate staff that lack skills and experience.

Author: dwapp